Public bid or private RFP, the decision is the same one.

Whether the buyer is a county purchasing office or an enterprise procurement team, you are answering two questions: is this worth chasing, and what do we say? Paavya answers both from your own record.

Built first for government contractors, federal, state and local, and used for any RFP, RFI or RFQ a team answers against a deadline.

Sized for teams of roughly 10 to 150 people.

Two kinds of buyer, one way of deciding.

  • Government and public agencies

    Rules-bound, deadline-driven and unforgiving on format. The bid is won or lost on compliance and evidence long before anyone judges your prose.

    The work: Section L and M instructions, compliance with every requirement, pass/fail clauses, page limits, mandatory forms, and set-aside eligibility.

    What hurts: a missed mandatory requirement can make the whole submission non-responsive, and many solicitations on the portal were never winnable for you.

    What Paavya does: reads the solicitation into its requirements and flags the pass/fail ones, checks your declared set-aside against your certifications, weighs the buyer's award history against your past performance, and records the decision with its reasons.

    For government contractors

  • Enterprise and commercial buyers

    Faster cycles, less formality, more scrutiny of security and references. The competition is often three firms that look identical on paper.

    The work: security questionnaires, SOC 2 and privacy reviews, vendor onboarding forms, references, pricing, and sometimes a live pitch.

    What hurts: answering the same security questions every quarter, and never knowing which answer actually moved the evaluation.

    What Paavya does: reuses approved answers that each carry an owner and a review date, flags an answer that is stale or disagrees with the Library before it goes out, and proposes the wording that won back to the Library.

    How commercial RFPs differ

Find your kind of RFP.

Each industry brings its own evidence, its own forms and its own reasons a bid gets thrown out.

What each person on the pursuit gets.

One system, four different reasons to open it.

  • BD and capture

    Which pursuits deserve the team.

    A bid or pass recommendation for each solicitation, read across buyer history, past performance, capacity and competition, so the go/no-go meeting is about judgment rather than gut feel.

  • Proposal managers

    A plan that is already owned.

    Extracted requirements, a proposed owner for every section with the reason, dates counted back from the deadline, and one place that shows what is blocking.

  • Subject-matter experts

    Asked once, not every quarter.

    Your approved answer is kept in the Library with its owner and review date, and offered under the next requirement it fits. You open Paavya on your own sections, not on everyone's.

  • Owners and executives

    Decisions, not activity.

    Every bid and no-bid with its reasons, the results recorded against them, and a win rate shown only once there are enough decided bids to stand behind one.

Three situations where it earns its place quickly.

If one of these is your quarter, start there.

  • Your first public bid

    You have never answered a solicitation before. Paavya reads it into requirements and marks the pass/fail ones, so the mandatory pieces are owned from the first day instead of learned the hard way.

  • A volume desk

    Dozens of questionnaires a quarter and three people to answer them. Approved answers with owners and review dates, offered where they fit and checked before they go out.

  • A flat win rate

    You bid plenty and win the same share every year. Recording each decision and its result is how you find out which bids you should have declined. Read about win-rate economics.

Start with the bid in front of you.

Commercial or public sector, the first pursuit tells you whether the reasoning is worth trusting.

30 minutes, on a solicitation you choose.